<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
<channel>
    <title>T3 Blog (Entries tagged as government)</title>
    <link>http://t3technet.com/blog/</link>
    <description>Rants, Informations, &amp; Things Probably Best Left Unsaid</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.2 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:17:16 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Maryland sales tax to apply to Computer Services</title>
    <link>http://t3technet.com/blog/index.php?/archives/10-Maryland-sales-tax-to-apply-to-Computer-Services.html</link>
    
    <comments>http://t3technet.com/blog/index.php?/archives/10-Maryland-sales-tax-to-apply-to-Computer-Services.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://t3technet.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=10</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://t3technet.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=10</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Tom Johnson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    As part of the special &quot;tax-grab&quot; session of the Maryland Legislature, rather than doing something sensible like eliminating any unecessary spending or otherwise reducing expenditures to address an alleged budget problem, they ultimately went with just trying to increase tax revenue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the things that was opposed by many constituents and companies was the inclusion of &quot;computer services&quot; into the sales tax increase bill. An amendment was proposed to remove the computer services portion, but that amendment was voted down. So as it stands, computer services will be subject to sales tax. Huh? :confused:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More details can be found at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mdchamber.com/blog/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.mdchamber.com/blog/&quot;&gt;MD Chamber of Commerce blog&lt;/a&gt; which has links to the bill text at MLIS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The language of the bill that was accepted is as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;blockquote&gt;                       Article – Tax – General&lt;br /&gt;
11–101.&lt;br /&gt;
     (C–1) (1) “COMPUTER SERVICE” INCLUDES:&lt;br /&gt;
               (I)   COMPUTER FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION;&lt;br /&gt;
               (II)  CUSTOM COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;&lt;br /&gt;
               (III) COMPUTER SYSTEM PLANNING AND DESIGN THAT	INTEGRATE COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND	COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES;&lt;br /&gt;
               (IV)  COMPUTER DISASTER RECOVERY; &lt;br /&gt;
               (V)   DATA PROCESSING, STORAGE, AND RECOVERY;&lt;br /&gt;
        &lt;br /&gt;
               (VI)  HARDWARE OR     SOFTWARE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
         (2)  “COMPUTER SERVICE” DOES NOT INCLUDE:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	 (I)   INTERNET ACCESS, AS DEFINED IN THE FEDERAL INTERNET TAX FREEDOM ACT;&lt;br /&gt;
                (II)  TYPING  OR  DATA  ENTRY   ON   WORD  PROCESSING EQUIPMENT;&lt;br /&gt;
                (III) COMPUTER TRAINING;&lt;br /&gt;
                (IV) THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, OR REPAIR OF  TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY OTHER THAN COMPUTER HARDWARE OR  SOFTWARE THAT INCLUDES COMPUTER HARDWARE OR SOFTWARE AS A   COMPONENT PART; OR&lt;br /&gt;
                (V)   A SERVICE OTHERWISE DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH (1)  OF THIS SUBSECTION THAT IS PROVIDED AS PART OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH:&lt;br /&gt;
                      1.   ELECTRONIC   FUND    TRANSFERS,   FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE TRANSACTIONS, OR OTHER BANKING OR TRUST SERVICES;&lt;br /&gt;
                      2.   BUSINESS       MANAGEMENT,     ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT, PERSONNEL, PAYROLL,  EMPLOYEE BENEFIT,    OR OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                    3.    EDUCATIONAL,     LEGAL,      ACCOUNTING, ARCHITECTURAL, ACTUARIAL, MEDICAL, MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC, OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES; OR&lt;br /&gt;
                    4.    TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems quite ambiguous with regards to the list of &quot;does not include&quot;. Does it mean that an outside vendor working on a problem with the accounting&lt;br /&gt;
software or any hardware involved in the accounting dept. is not subject to sales tax? Is outside vendor work on a companies&#039; web or email server taxable because it&#039;s not related to business management? Is all in-house tech support excluded? One would think so. Is network security analysis or protection measures considered &#039;services&#039;? Is any work done on a network or computer used for professional services, banking, or in business management excluded?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mdchamber.com/blog/2007/11/marylands_computer_service_tax.php&quot;&gt;web design is included.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I still have several questions myself on exactly what this law is supposed to apply to, besides the obvious why or how can a sales tax legally be applied to services. I think it is ridiculous and bizarre to say the least. The fact that such legislation even passed just goes to show how out of touch with reality, and their constituents, the MD legislature is. My biggest question is, as a DE company, do I need to collect sales tax for work done for MD clients? If this is so, I will very likely be refusing any such work once this goes into effect. &lt;img src=&quot;http://t3technet.com/blog/templates/default/img/emoticons/sad.png&quot; alt=&quot;:-(&quot; style=&quot;display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;&quot; class=&quot;emoticon&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:55:38 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://t3technet.com/blog/index.php?/archives/10-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license><category>computer</category>
<category>government</category>
<category>news</category>
<category>politics</category>
<category>services</category>
<category>taxes</category>

</item>
<item>
    <title>Happy Bill of Rights Day</title>
    <link>http://t3technet.com/blog/index.php?/archives/9-Happy-Bill-of-Rights-Day.html</link>
    
    <comments>http://t3technet.com/blog/index.php?/archives/9-Happy-Bill-of-Rights-Day.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://t3technet.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=9</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://t3technet.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=9</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Tom Johnson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    The Bill of Rights was ratified on this day in 1791. Arguably the Founders should have been more specific in certain regards, but the Ninth and Tenth Amendments &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; have cleared up any questions. However, these Amendments have been pretty well disregarded as not having any effect or bearing on anything, and most of the others have been manipulated to have little effect as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on the Bill of Rights and its celebration visit these links:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://billofrightsinstitute.org/borday/&quot; title=&quot;http://billofrightsinstitute.org/borday/&quot;&gt;http://billofrightsinstitute.org/borday/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jpfo.org/smith/smith-bor-07.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.jpfo.org/smith/smith-bor-07.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lewrockwell.com/gregory/gregory49.html&quot;&gt;http://www.lewrockwell.com/gregory/gregory49.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surprisingly, the President has even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/12/20071206-10.html&quot;&gt;issued a proclamation&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
I say surprisingly as the Bill of Rights seems to be largely ignored and chipped away by the fed.gov in general. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hopefully this trend reverses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.&quot;   --  John F. Kennedy 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:35:56 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://t3technet.com/blog/index.php?/archives/9-guid.html</guid>
    <creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</creativeCommons:license><category>government</category>
<category>news</category>
<category>politics</category>
<category>privacy</category>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>